CH EN

AMBOW

EDUCATION

對工作懷有熱愛之人,才能收穫工作的幸福感!
动态
10 FEB 2019

Clarifying User Needs

Hmm, I need to clarify the user's needs relating to United's set-piece performance and potential headline requests. I want to avoid inaccuracies, especially with terms like [[NEWS.CONTENT_HTML]]quot;4连杀[[NEWS.CONTENT_HTML]]quot; for Tottenham wanting four consecutive wins. It’s safer to ask for clarity and suggest an outline, including what specific data they’re interested in, such as recent match records and injuries. I can also present several headline variations that keep the information concise and provide choices for how they’d like to proceed.Clarifying Europa Match Details

I want to be concise, but they mentioned the [[NEWS.CONTENT_HTML]]quot;欧罗巴决战[[NEWS.CONTENT_HTML]]quot; or Europa showdown, so I need to provide a caution since the fixture isn’t confirmed. They might be referring to the battle for Europa spots in the EPL. I should use the neutral term [[NEWS.CONTENT_HTML]]quot;欧战席位[[NEWS.CONTENT_HTML]]quot; to keep things clear. I can suggest datapoints to check, like the last 10 head-to-head matches, recent form, and various metrics. It might also be good to ask if they want a pre-match analysis, data article, or just a headline rewrite.

这是在找赛前稿还是要改标题?我可以两种都来。先给你选项:

  1. 赛前数据与胜率预测(基于历史与通用指标,给出倾向与风险点)
  2. 战术对位简析(高位压迫 vs 反击、边路与定位球)
  3. 投注明线与风险提示(不含实时赔率)
  4. 标题/导语改写(新闻口径)

结构\n

先给几条可用标题,贴合“押宝欧战/破咒4连杀”的语气:

  • 欧战生死线临近:热刺曼联押宝一战,数据示警“4连杀”难度不小
  • 抢欧战席位成分水岭:热刺欲破曼联“连胜咒”,模型倾向并不极端
  • 决战前夜:历史交锋分歧大,热刺四连杀门槛高?关键看转换与定位球
  • 高压对决快反:热刺想连斩曼联,样本与客观数据给出审慎结论
  • 不是玄学是样本:四连杀概率低于直觉,细节在进攻端效率与失误率

如果你要一篇快速赛前数据稿,我可按这个结构落地(你确认后我就写):

  • 近10场状态:胜平负、进失球、xG差、主客场分裂
  • 交锋脉络:近10次H2H结果、客场/主场拆分、先失球后的胜率
  • 战术对位:热刺高位压迫+高线 vs 曼联转换与弱侧突击;二次进攻与定位球
  • 关键变量:伤停(中卫/后腰)、两侧边卫的身后空间、角球/任意球质量
  • 分先失球后\n

  • 概率区间:主胜/平/客胜的区间倾向+风险提示(不替代实时赔率)

补充两点我需要你确认:

  • 具体比赛时间/场地,是否确指欧联杯对决,还是“抢欧战席位”的联赛关键战
  • 是否需要投注角度(让球/大小球/进球者)还是纯赛前分析

告诉我选哪种,我立刻给出成稿或数据分析。

回到列表